7 Contributors
in this discussion.
I think it is important that people learn about all the religions of the world. As long as the course does not promote any religion as correct, or put down any religions, I do not think it would be a problem for anyone. It is simply a fact that people are different from each other, have different opinions and views, live in different cultures and, naturally, have different religions.
While the schools should not preach religion, it is acceptable for schools to offer classes on religion, as long as they are unbiased and include alternative religions, and not just the three main players of religion. I think this would be very hard for people to do, because they are already biased. It is a good idea. But, will it work? No.
I know there is the separation of church and state rule, but as long as these courses are being offered as an elective and not a requirement I don't see a problem with it. Religion shouldn't be a taboo, and if a child wants to learn about other culture's beliefs we should let them.
There is no good reason to restrict from public schools the study of religion. Religion is such a large and vital part of the world in which we live, and to restrict public school students from studying it would be foolish at best. Going out in to the world with little or no knowledge about something that affects the majority of the world's population makes students unprepared to be productive members of society. In reality, the study of the world's religions should be required in public school, especially since studying them doesn't mean you have to join them.
I don't think the schools should proselytize to our children. But you can't properly teach about the history of human beings without including the huge role that religion has played. We already teach about the paganism of the Greeks and Romans anyhow. As long as the schools are careful not to endorse one religion over another, teaching about religion is fine.
Religion is as much a part of our culture, everyone's culture, as anything else. Whether you believe in a higher intelligence or not, religion is all around us, and it makes no sense to discount it. It's not about teaching doctrines, but about examining popular belief systems for a better understanding of our neighbors.
Learning religion in public school could represent a risk of proselytism. Religion should therefore be banned of public area. We can trust our teacher to teach mathematic but what about something which go beyond any scientific view. It would be fair if any teachers would be atheists. Obviously, it s difficult to be neutral when we are talking about private opinions. I’m not opposed to learning about religions from a historic point of view as it permits to understand some cultural differences. Nevertheless, I m against teaching religion based on the principles and ideas. For me, pedagogy must focus on civism to spread the very essence of tolerance in our young mind. I’m not talking about blind patriotism but more essentially about universal values such as equality or liberty. Liberty of faith should be considered here with its rights and duties according to the law.